Gernsbacher, Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. Psycholinguistics electrified: Event-related brain potential investigations. ![]() Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Reading between the lines: Event-related brain potentials during natural sentence processing. Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes. On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related brain potential. job description on occupational sex typing. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371–375. The ten-twenty system of the International Foundation. Report to the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography: Appendix. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 63, 932–944. The impact of mothers’ genderrole stereotypic beliefs on mothers’ and children’s ability perceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 518–527. The influence of gender stereotypes on parent and child math attitudes. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 668–689. Lexical expectations in parsing complement-verb sentences. New York: New York Physiological Society. Plum (Ed.), Handbook of physiology: Section 1. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 41, 98–110. The vagaries of sex bias: Conditions regulating the underevaluation, equivocation, and overvaluation of female job applicants. Language & Cognitive Processes, 8, 337–364. The syntactic positive shift as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Introduction to government and binding theory. Syntactic violations and ERPs: P600 or P3b? Poster presented at the Eighth Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. On methods in the analysis of profile data. The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 182–201.įairweather, H. Gender-role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents’ role in the socialization of gender differences in self-perceptions and skill acquisition. On quantifying surprise: The variation in event-related potentials with subjective probability. Surprise? Psychophysiology, 18, 493–513.ĭuncan-Johnson, C. ![]() Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology: Vol. Poster presented at the Eighth Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing.ĭawes, R. The late show: The syntactic positive shift meets the late positive component. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13, 307–319.Ĭoulson, S., King, J., & Kutas, M. Verb frame preferences: Descriptive norms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 609–619.Ĭonnine, C., Ferreira, F., Jones, C., Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. The effects of person and job stereotypes on two personnel decisions. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359.Ĭleveland, J. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. If attitudes affect how stimuli are processed, should they not affect the event-related brain potential? Psychological Science, 4, 108–112.Ĭlark, H. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 15–38.Ĭacioppo, J. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 65, 272–281.īrigham, J. Implicit stereotyping in person judgment. Psychological Science, 7, 136–141.īanaji, M. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 68, 181–198.īanaji, M. Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. These results are taken to indicate that ERPs are sensitive to violations of gender-based occupational stereotypes and that the ERP response to stereotype violations is similar to the P600 effect elicited by a variety of syntactic anomalies.īanaji, M. Finally, female subjects exhibited larger positivities than did male subjects, regardless of whether the gender mismatch involved a definitional or stereotypical antecedent. Furthermore, the positive wave elicited by stereotype violations persisted even when subjects judged these sentences to be acceptable. Violations of gender definitions elicited a larger positive wave than did violations of gender stereotypes. Pronouns that disagreed with the gender definition or gender stereotype of the antecedent elicited a large-amplitude positive wave. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded while 14 males and 14 females read sentences containing a reflexive pronoun that referred to a definitionally or stereotypically male or female antecedent noun.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |